Method and system for retrieving information from wireless sensor nodes

ABSTRACT

A system supporting data retrieval from a plurality of wireless sensor nodes is defined. The system includes the plurality of wireless sensor nodes and a data retrieval device. The plurality of wireless sensor nodes include a transceiver receiving a first signal and transmitting a second signal. The second signal includes a sensed datum or an encoded statistic based on the sensed datum identified at the plurality of wireless sensor nodes. The data retrieval device includes a plurality of antennas transmitting the first signal toward the plurality of wireless sensor nodes and receiving the second signal from the plurality of wireless sensor nodes, and a processor coupled to receive the received second signal from the plurality of antennas, the processor defining a virtual receive signal from the received second signal for the plurality of antennas and processing the defined virtual receive signal to determine the identified sensed datum.

REFERENCE TO GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with United States government support awarded bythe following agencies: NSF 0431088. The United States government hascertain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The subject of the disclosure relates generally to wireless sensornetworking. More specifically, the disclosure relates to a method and asystem of retrieving information from a network or ensemble of wirelesssensor nodes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Wireless sensor networking is an emerging technology that promises anunprecedented ability to monitor the physical environment using anetwork of relatively inexpensive sensor nodes that can sense thephysical environment in a variety of modalities including temperature,pressure, chemical concentration, motion, etc. Sensor networks mayconsist of a large number of sensor nodes with communication, sensing,and computation capabilities. Because the wireless sensor nodes aretypically battery powered, the sensor nodes may be severely constrainedrelative to their energy supply. Existing approaches to data collectionand information extraction from the wireless sensor nodes rely onin-network processing that requires information routing and coordinationbetween sensor nodes. Multiple hops between sensor nodes may be requiredto reach a remote destination where the data is to be processed. Thus,in-network processing of collected data from the wireless sensor nodestypically requires significantly more energy than the sensing orcomputation processing. Additionally, each sensor node may requireadditional computational capability in order to form an ad-hoc network.As a result, there is a delay associated with receipt of the informationas it propagates through the network from node-to-node and potentiallyadditional energy consumption requirements as sensor nodes propagate theinformation sensed by other sensor nodes.

The location of the phenomena being sensed may be critical to manysensor network applications as well. As a result, the data transmittedbetween sensor nodes in typical sensor networks includes the location ofthe originating sensor node. The absolute location of the sensor nodemay not be known, however, necessitating use of a positioning technologysuch as inclusion of a global positioning system (GPS) receiver at eachsensor node. GPS receivers are vulnerable to jamming and to attenuation.Additionally, the inclusion of a GPS receiver at each sensor nodeincreases the cost of each sensor node. Thus, what is needed is a systemthat supports information retrieval from the sensor nodes in a more costeffective manner. What is additionally needed is a system that supportsreceipt of the sensed data with reduced latency and with improved energyefficiency.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An exemplary embodiment provides a system and a method for supportingdata retrieval from a plurality of sensor nodes-with improved energyefficiency, reduced latency, and reduced cost. The system utilizes andata retrieval device that queries a plurality of sensor nodes to obtainthe sensed data in a rapid and energy-efficient manner. The sensor nodesrequire only limited computational capability. In an exemplaryembodiment, the data retrieval device includes the necessarycomputational capability and an antenna array for receiving signals fromthe plurality of sensor nodes. The data retrieval device transmits awideband signal in the direction of the plurality of sensor nodes. Inresponse, the plurality of sensor nodes send a signal in the directionof the data retrieval device that includes the sensed data. Theplurality of sensor nodes act as active scatterers producing a multipathresponse to the wideband signal transmitted from the data retrievaldevice. The multipath signals received at the data retrieval deviceinclude the sensed data transmitted from the plurality of sensor nodes.The multipath signals may be resolved spatially in angle and/or in rangeand based on Doppler frequency, if the sensor nodes and/or the dataretrieval device are moving. The transmitted signals from the sensornodes also may be encoded to further enable distinguishing the returnsignal from different sensor nodes.

The system includes, but is not limited to, a plurality of wirelesssensor nodes and a data retrieval device. The plurality of wirelesssensor nodes include a transceiver receiving a first signal andtransmitting a second signal. The second signal includes a sensed datumidentified at the plurality of wireless sensor nodes. The data retrievaldevice includes a plurality of antennas transmitting the first signaltoward the plurality of wireless sensor nodes and receiving the secondsignal from the plurality of wireless sensor nodes, and a processorcoupled to receive the received second signal from the plurality ofantennas, the processor defining a virtual receive signal from thereceived second signal for the plurality of antennas and processing thedefined virtual receive signal to determine the identified sensed datum.

Another exemplary embodiment of the invention comprises a method ofretrieving data from a plurality of wireless sensor nodes. The methodincludes, but is not limited to, transmitting a first signal from aplurality of antennas toward a plurality of wireless sensor nodes,receiving a second signal from the plurality of wireless sensor nodes atthe plurality of antennas, defining a virtual receive signal from thereceived second signal for the plurality of antennas, and processing thedefined virtual receive signal to determine a sensed datum. The senseddatum is identified at the plurality of wireless sensor nodes and thesecond signal includes the sensed datum.

Other principal features and advantages of the invention will becomeapparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the followingdrawings, the detailed description, and the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Exemplary embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described withreference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like numerals willdenote like elements.

FIG. 1 depicts a data retrieval system in accordance with an exemplaryembodiment.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating exemplary operations performed ata data retrieval device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating exemplary operations performed ata sensor node in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the data retrieval device in accordancewith an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary sensor node in accordance withan exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a probability of error as a function ofsignal-to-noise ration assuming independent transmissions from eachsensor node in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a graph comparing the theoretical values of the probability oferror with experimentally determined values in a similar set ofexperiments as in FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating a probability of error as a function ofsignal-to-noise ratio assuming independent transmissions from eachsensor node and use of an interference suppression in accordance with anexemplary embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating a probability of error as a function ofsignal-to-noise ratio assuming identical transmissions from each sensornode in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

With reference to FIG. 1, a data retrieval system 20 is shown. Dataretrieval system 20 includes a plurality of sensor nodes 22 and a dataretrieval device 24. The plurality of sensor nodes 22 may be distributedover a region 26 randomly, uniformly, non-uniformly, etc. depending atleast partially on the sensing requirements of data retrieval system 20.The exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1. shows a non-uniform distribution ofthe plurality of sensor nodes 22. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1,data retrieval device 24 includes a plurality of antenna elements 28arranged in a uniform linear array 32. The plurality of antenna elements28 may be arranged to form a uniform or non-uniform linear array, arectangular array, a circular array, a conformal array, etc. The problemof detecting and localizing scattering objects using pulsed signals andantenna arrays is similar to that encountered in radar systems, such asthose used for air traffic control, military surveillance, imaging oftargets, etc. Data retrieval device 24 is located sufficiently far fromregion 26 such that far-field assumptions apply. Region 26 can bespatially divided into a plurality of spatial beams 40 and a pluralityof time delay rings 42 based on the spatio-temporal resolution supportedby data retrieval device 24.

In an exemplary embodiment, data retrieval device 24 transmits awideband (spread-spectrum) signaling waveforms, s_(m)(t), from theplurality of antenna elements 28. Each signaling waveform is of durationT and two-sided bandwidth W. N=TW>>1 denotes the time-bandwidth productof the temporal signaling waveforms from each antenna element andrepresents the approximate dimension of the temporal signal space. Thus,the signal space of spatio-temporal interrogation waveforms transmittedby the plurality of antennas has dimension MN=MTW, where M is the numberof antennas of the plurality of antenna elements 28.

In an exemplary embodiment, data retrieval device 24 and the pluralityof sensor nodes 22 are carrier frequency synchronized, but not phasesynchronized, and the phase offset between the plurality of sensor nodes22 and data retrieval device 24 stays relatively constant during thesignal duration T. With reference to FIG. 2, exemplary operationsperformed at data retrieval device 24 are described. With reference toFIG. 3, exemplary operations performed at an exemplary sensor node 30 ofthe plurality of sensor nodes 22 are described. Data retrieval device 24transmits a space-time signal s(t)=[s₀(t), s₁(t), . . . ,s_(M−1)(t)]^(T) in an interrogation packet to initiate data retrievalfrom the plurality of sensor nodes 22 in an operation 50. The i^(th)sensor node receives a superposition of the transmitted space-timesignals, in an operation 80, $\begin{matrix}{{{x_{i}(t)} = {\sum\limits_{\mu = 0}^{M - 1}{{s_{\mu}\left( {t - \tau_{i,\mu}} \right)}{\mathbb{e}}^{- {j\phi}_{i,\mu}}}}},} & (1)\end{matrix}$where τ_(i,μ) is the relative time-delay between the i^(th) sensor nodeof the plurality of sensor nodes 22 and μ^(th) antenna of the pluralityof antenna elements 28 and φ_(i,μ) is the resulting relative phaseoffset. τ_(i,μ) is fixed with respect to an antenna 34 in the middle oflinear array 32. The noise is assumed to be negligible because thespace-time signal is transmitted with sufficient power or is repeated asufficient number of times to reduce the noise to a negligible amount.

In the far-field, and under appropriate choice of W such that max_(μ)τ_(i,μ)−min_(μ) τ_(i,μ)<<1/W for all i, the differences in the relativetime delays between a sensor node of the plurality of sensor nodes 22and a different antenna of the plurality of antenna elements 28 can beneglected in the signaling waveform. Thus,s_(μ)(t−τ_(i,μ))≈s_(μ)(t−τ_(i)), for all μ, where τ_(i) denotes thecommon delay from the i^(th) sensor node to all antennas in theplurality of antenna elements 28. The relative phase offsets φ_(i,μ) inx_(i)(t) include a common, random component φ_(i) and a deterministiccomponent that is captured by a steering response vector of linear array32. In an exemplary embodiment, a one-dimensional uniform linear arrayhaving an odd number of antennas separated by a spacing d betweenantenna elements of linear array 32 is used. The steering responsevector for linear array 32 is given bya(θ)=[e ^(j2π{tilde over (m)}θ), . . . ,1, . . .,e^(−j2π{tilde over (m)}θ)]^(T),  (2)where {tilde over (M)}=(M−1)/2, and the normalized angle θ is related tothe physical angle of arrival/departure φ as θ=d sin((φ)/λ, where λ isthe wavelength of propagation. The steering response vector of equation(2) represents the relative phases across the plurality of antennaelements 28 for transmitting/receiving a beam in the direction θ. Thus,x_(i)(t) can be compactly expressed asx _(i)(t)=e ^(−jφ) a ^(T)(θ_(i))s(t−τ _(i))  (3)where θ_(i) denotes the direction of the i^(th) sensor node relative todata retrieval device 24. As an example, a physical angle ofarrival/departure 36 to sensor node 30 is indicated in FIG. 1. In theexemplary embodiment, d=λ/2 spacing, which corresponds to the pluralityof sensor nodes 22 projecting a maximum angular coverage spread of 180degrees from data retrieval device 24. A larger spacing d betweenantennas of the plurality of antenna elements 28 can be used with aresulting smaller angular coverage spread as known to those skilled inthe art.

In an operation 82, the i^(th) sensor node identifies a code includedwith the received signal. In an operation 84, the i^(th) sensor nodeidentifies a sensed datum using a sensing capability at the i^(th)sensor node. The sensor nodes can sense the physical environment in avariety of modalities including temperature, pressure, chemicalconcentration, motion, etc. In an operation 86, the i^(th) sensor nodeencodes the identified datum in a parameter β_(i) using the identifiedcode. The identified datum may be an instantaneous value of the sensorat the node, or may be a sequence of sensor values measured at thesensor node over a period of time, depending on the rate of temporalvariation in the signal field. The encoding of the identified datum maybe done in a variety of ways, known to those skilled in the art, tocompress the information in the identified datum. In an operation 88,the i^(th) sensor node modulates x_(i)(t) by β_(i), representingamplitude modulation in an exemplary embodiment. Other modulation andcoding (across multiple repeated transmissions of x_(i)(t)) methods mayalso be used as known to those skilled in the art. In an exemplaryembodiment, the i^(th) sensor node, in an operation 90, waits aspecified time duration after receiving the transmitted space-timesignals. The specified time duration may be the same for all of theplurality of sensor nodes 22. In an operation 92, the i^(th) sensor nodetransmits the modulated signal with energy ε. In an exemplaryembodiment, the specified time duration is zero so that transmission ofthe modulated signal is instantaneous from each sensor node, and thetransmitted signal from the i^(th) sensor node can be expressed as$\begin{matrix}{{{y_{i}(t)} = {\beta_{i}\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}}},{{x_{i}(t)} = {\beta_{i}\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}{\mathbb{e}}^{- {j\varphi}_{i}}{a^{T}\left( \theta_{i} \right)}{s\left( {t - \tau_{i}} \right)}}},} & (4)\end{matrix}$where |β_(i)|≧1 and ∫E[|x_(i)(t)|²]dt=M so that y_(i)(t) has energy ε.

In an operation 52, data retrieval device 24 receives a vector signalr(t)=[r₀(t), r_(i)(t), . . . , r_(M−1)(t)]^(T), which is a superpositionof all sensor transmissions and, by the principle of reciprocity, can beexpressed as $\begin{matrix}{{{r(t)} = {{\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{K}{\beta_{i}{\mathbb{e}}^{- {j\varphi}_{i}}{a\left( \theta_{i} \right)}{a^{T}\left( \theta_{i} \right)}{s\left( {t - {\overset{\sim}{\tau}}_{i}} \right)}}}} + {w(t)}}},} & (5)\end{matrix}$where {tilde over (τ)}_(i)=2τ_(i) denotes the round-trip relative delayin the response from the i^(th) sensor node; w(t) denotes an additivewhite Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector process that represents the noise atthe plurality of antenna elements 28; and the random phase φ_(i). Letτ_(max)=max_(i)τ_(i) and assume that min_(i) τ_(i)=0 without loss ofgenerality (WLOG). Using equation (5), the effective system equationrelating the received vector signal at the plurality of antenna elements28 to the transmitted space-time signal s(t) can be expressed as$\begin{matrix}{{r(t)} = {{\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}{\int_{0}^{2\tau_{\max}}{{H\left( t^{\prime} \right)}{s\left( {t - t^{\prime}} \right)}{\mathbb{d}t^{\prime}}}}} + {w(t)}}} & (6) \\{{{H(t)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{K}{\alpha_{i}{\delta\left( {t - \tau_{i}} \right)}{a\left( \theta_{i} \right)}{a^{T}\left( \theta_{i} \right)}}}},} & (7)\end{matrix}$where α₁=β_(ie) ^(−jφ) ^(i) and the M×M matrix H(t) represents theimpulse response for the space-time multipath channel. The delay spread(spread of the relative delays in the transmissions from the pluralityof sensor nodes 22) of the channel is 2τ_(max) illustrated by 38 inFIG. 1. The packet signaling duration T is assumed to be >>2τ_(max). Theresulting system representation shown in equation (6) is independent ofthe power used for transmitting the space-time signal s(t) even thoughit relates the signal s(t) to the received signal r(t) at the dataretrieval device 24 because, after receiving the transmitted space-timesignals, each sensor node 32 retransmits the signal with energy ε, andthe factor √{square root over (ε)}|√{square root over (M)} reflects thisnormalization.

The active sensing channel matrix of equation (7) has the same form asthe impulse response of a physical multiple input, multiple output(MIMO) multipath wireless channel encountered in wireless transmissionand reception with devices having a plurality of antenna elements. Thesensor data and phases in α_(i) in the sensing channel correspond to thecomplex path gains associated with scattering paths in a MIMO multipathwireless channel. Multiple antenna arrays are used for transmitting datain wireless communication systems. For example, multiple antennas may beused at both the transmitter and at the receiver. Unfortunately, therelatively high dimensional nature of multiple antenna array systemsresults in a high computational complexity in practical systems. For adiscussion of a method for modeling a scattering environment in amultiple antenna wireless communication system that has multipletransmitter elements and multiple receiver elements and a scatteringenvironment with scattering objects located between the transmitter andreceiver elements, see U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/652,373,entitled a “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MODELING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONCHANNEL,” filed Aug. 29, 2003.

The method includes applying fixed virtual signal characteristics to thescattering environment, and generating a channel matrix that couples thetransmitter and receiver elements based upon the applied fixed virtualsignal characteristics resulting in a unitarily equivalentrepresentation of the physical sensing/multipath channel matrix. A keyproperty of the virtual channel representation is that its coefficientsrepresent a resolution of multipath/sensors in angle, in delay, and inDoppler, where there is relative motion between the data retrievaldevice 24 and each sensor node commensurate with the signal spaceparameters M, W, and T, respectively. The virtual representation inangle corresponds to beamforming in M fixed virtual directions: {tildeover (θ)}_(m)=m/M, m=−M, . . . , {tilde over (M)}. The M×M unitary,discrete Fourier transform matrix can be defined as $\begin{matrix}{A = {\frac{1}{\sqrt{M}}\left\lbrack {{a\left( {{- \overset{\sim}{M}}/M} \right)},\ldots\quad,1,\ldots\quad,{a\left( {{- \overset{\sim}{M}}/M} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} & (8)\end{matrix}$whose columns are the normalized steering vectors for the virtual anglesand which form an orthonormal basis for the spatial signal space. Thevirtual spatial matrix H_(v)(t) is unitarily equivalent to H(t) asH(t)=AH _(v)(t)A ^(T) ⇄H _(v)(t)=A ^(H) H(t)A*  (9)and the virtual coefficients, representing the coupling between them^(th) transmit beam and m′^(th) receive beam are given by$\begin{matrix}{\begin{matrix}{{H_{V}\left( {m^{\prime},{m;t}} \right)} = {{a^{H}\left( {m^{\prime}/M} \right)}{H(t)}{{a^{*}\left( {m/M} \right)}/M}}} \\{= {M{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{K}{\alpha_{i}{g\left( {\theta_{i} - \frac{m^{\prime}}{M}} \right)}{g\left( {\theta_{i} - \frac{m}{M}} \right)}}}}}\end{matrix}{{\delta\left( {t - {\overset{\sim}{\tau}}_{i}} \right)} \approx {{H_{V}\left( {m,{m;t}} \right)}\delta_{m - m^{\prime}}}}{{{H_{V}\left( {m,{m;t}} \right)} \approx {M{\sum\limits_{i \in S_{\theta,m}}{\alpha_{i}{g^{2}\left( {\theta_{i} - \frac{m}{M}} \right)}{\delta\left( {t - {\overset{\sim}{\tau}}_{i}} \right)}}}}},}} & \begin{matrix}\quad \\(10) \\\quad \\\quad \\(11) \\(12) \\(13)\end{matrix}\end{matrix}$where${g(\theta)} = \frac{\sin\quad\left( {\pi\quad M\quad\theta} \right)}{M\quad\sin\quad\left( {\pi\quad\theta} \right)}$is the Dirichlet sinc function that captures the interaction between thefixed virtual beams and the true sensor directions; δ_(m) denotes thekronecker delta function; and S_(θ,m) ={i∈{1 . . . ,K}:−½M<θ_(i)−m/M≦½M} denotes the set of all sensor nodes whose angleslie in the m^(th) spatial resolution bin of width Δθ=1/M, centeredaround the m^(th) beam. The last approximation of equation (13) followsfrom the virtual path partitioning due to beamforming in the virtualrepresentation. Thus, the virtual spatial representation partitions thesensors in angle and is approximately diagonal such that the m^(th)diagonal entry contains the superposition of all sensor node responsesthat lie within the m^(th) beam of width 1/M. While the use of spatialbasis functions corresponding to beams in fixed virtual directions areemphasized in the current exemplary embodiment, other spatial basisfunctions that form a complete basis for the spatial signal space mayalso be used.

The sensor responses within each spatial beam of the plurality ofspatial beams 40 can be further partitioned by resolving their delayswith resolution Δτ=1/W. Various transmission methods, e.g. spreadspectrum, are capable of resolving the sensor responses with resolutionΔτ=1/W, as known to those skilled in the art. Let L=┌2τ_(max)W┐ be thelargest normalized delay spread. The diagonal entries of the virtualspatial matrix can be further decomposed into virtual, uniformly spaceddelays as $\begin{matrix}{{H_{V}\left( {m,{m;t}} \right)} \approx {M{\sum\limits_{\ell = 0}^{L}{{H_{V}\left( {m,m,\ell} \right)}{\delta\left( {t - {\ell/W}} \right)}}}}} & (14) \\{{H_{V}\left( {m,m,\ell} \right)} = {M{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{K}{\alpha_{i}{g^{2}\left( {\theta_{i} - \frac{m}{M}} \right)}\sin\quad{c\left( {{W\quad{\overset{\sim}{\tau}}_{i}} - \ell} \right)}}}}} & (15) \\{\quad{{\approx \quad{M{\sum\limits_{{i \in S_{0}},{m\bigcap S_{\tau,\ell}}}{\alpha_{i}{g^{2}\left( {\theta_{i} - \frac{m}{M}} \right)}\sin\quad{c\left( {{W\quad{\overset{\sim}{\tau}}_{i}} - \ell} \right)}}}}},}} & (16)\end{matrix}$where sinc(x)=sin(πx)/πx captures the interaction between the fixedvirtual and true sensor node delays, and S_(τ,l)={i:−½W<{tilde over(τ)}_(i)−l/≦½W} is the set of all sensor nodes whose relative delays liewithin an l^(th) delay resolution bin of the plurality of time delayrings 42. Thus, the angle-delay virtual representation partitions thesensor node responses into distinct angle and time delay resolutionbins. The virtual coefficient H_(v) (m,m, f) is a superposition of allsensor node responses whose angles and time delays lie in theintersection of the m^(th) spatial beam and the l^(th) delay resolutionbin. For a given number of antennas M and for a given minimum spacingbetween sensor nodes, the bandwidth W can be chosen sufficiently large,in principle, so that there is only one sensor in each angle-delayresolution bin. In this case, a one-to-one mapping between i(m, l) and(m(i), l(i)) can be defined to associate each sensor node with a uniqueangle-delay resolution bin. From equation (16), data retrieval from thei^(th) sensor node amounts to estimating the corresponding virtualangle-delay coefficienth _(v)(m,l)=H _(v)(m,m,l)⇄Mβ _(i(m,l))γ_(i(m,l))γ_(i(m,l)) =e ^(−jφ) ^(i) g ²(θ_(i) −m/M)sinc(W{tilde over (τ)} _(i)−l)|_(i=i(m,l)).  (17)

In an operation 54, a virtual receive signal r_(v)(t) is defined from abeamforming matrix A^(H) and the received signal r(t) for each antennaof the plurality of antenna elements 28 as s(t)=As_(v)(t) andr_(v)(t)=A^(H)r(t) where s_(v)(t) and r_(v)(t) are the M-dimensionaltransmitted and received signals in the virtual spatial domain(beamspace). s_(v)(t) represents the temporal codes acquired by thesensor nodes in different virtual spatial bins. These temporal codes canbe spread spectrum codes or other codes that enable delay resolution asknown to those skilled in the art. Using equations (6), (9), and (14),the system equation, ignoring any delay in re-transmission by the sensornodes, that relates the received signal to the transmitted signal in thebeamspace is $\begin{matrix}{{{r_{V}(t)} = {{\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}{\sum\limits_{\ell = 0}^{L}{{H_{V}(\ell)}{s_{V}\left( {t - {\ell/W}} \right)}}}} + {w_{V}(t)}}},} & (18)\end{matrix}$where H_(v)(l) represents the virtual spatial matrix corresponding tothe l^(th) virtual delay and w_(v)(t) represents a vector ofindependent, temporal AWGN processes with a power spectral density ofσ². The m^(th) component of s_(v)(t), s_(v)(m; t), is a unit-energypseudo-random waveform with bandwidth W and duration T. In an exemplaryembodiment, s_(v)(m; t) is a direct-sequence spread spectrum waveform.As a result,(s _(V)(m;t−e/W ₎ ,s _(V)(m;t−l′/W))≈δ _(l−l′).  (19)In an operation 56, each r_(v)(m; t), the m^(th) component of r_(v)(t),is correlated (matched filtered) with a delayed version of s_(v)(m; t)yielding the sufficient statistics for data retrieval $\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{z_{m,\ell} = \left( {{r_{V}\left( {m;t} \right)},{s_{V}\left( {m;{t - {\ell/W}}} \right)}} \right\rangle} \\{\approx {\int_{0}^{T + {2\tau_{\max}}}\left( {{r_{V}\left( {m;t} \right)}{s_{v}^{*}\left( {m,{t - {\ell/W}}} \right)}{{\mathbb{d}t}.}} \right.}}\end{matrix} & \begin{matrix}(20) \\(21)\end{matrix}\end{matrix}$

In an 58, each matched filtered or correlator output, z_(m,l) f isdecoded to yield the sensed datum {tilde over (β)}₁ . . . {tilde over(β)}_(K) from each sensor node, where K is the number of sensor nodes ofthe plurality of sensor nodes 22. In general, the matched-filter outputsin equation (21) include the desired response from the sensor node inthe (m, l)^(th) angle-delay resolution bin as well as interference fromsensors in other resolution bins. Such interference is virtuallyeliminated in the ideal situation when each sensor node is located inthe center of an angle-delay resolution bin. This situation results when(θ_(i), τ_(i))=(m/M, l/W) for some m∈{−{tilde over (M)}, . . . , {tildeover (M)}} and t∈{0, . . . , L−1}. In this case, using equation (17),r_(v)(m; t) and z_(m,l) can be simplified to $\begin{matrix}{{r_{V}\left( {m;t} \right)} \approx {{\sqrt{\frac{ɛ}{M}}{\sum\limits_{\ell = 0}^{L}{{h_{V}\left( {m,\ell} \right)}{s_{V}\left( {m;{t - \frac{\ell}{W}}} \right)}}}} + {w_{V}\left( {m;t} \right)}}} & (22) \\{{z_{m,\ell} = {{\sqrt{M\quad ɛ}\beta_{i{({m,\wp})}}\gamma_{i{({m,\ell})}}} + w_{m,\ell}}},} & (23)\end{matrix}$where w_(m,l) are independent and identically distributed (iid) Gaussianwith variance σ². The factor √{square root over (m)} reflects the M-foldarray gain or the beamforming gain in reception associated with anM-element antenna array.

While different spreading codes can be assigned to different spatialsectors, use of the same spread-spectrum waveform, q(t) may betransmitted in all spatial beams in an exemplary embodiment. In such anexemplary embodiment, s_(v)(m; t)=q(t) for all m. Assuming that there issufficient angle-delay resolution so that each sensor node lies in aunique angle-delay resolution bin and there are k<ML angle-delayresolution bins occupied by transmitting sensor nodes, the matchedfilter outputs corresponding to the i^(th) sensor node can be uniquelylabeled by the mapping z(m(i),l(i))→z_(i) for i=1 . . . , Kk. Thematched filter outputs can be expressed as $\begin{matrix}{{z_{i} = {{\sqrt{M\quad ɛ}\beta_{i}{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}} + {\sqrt{M\quad ɛ}{\sum\limits_{k \neq i}{\beta_{k}{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{k,i}}}} + w_{i}}},} & (24)\end{matrix}$where √{square root over (Mε)}β_(i){tilde over (γ)}_(i) represents thedesired signal component from the i^(th) sensor node, β_(k){tilde over(γ)}_(k,i), k≠i; represents the interference due to the other K−1 sensornodes located in other resolution bins,{tilde over (γ)}k,i=e ^(−jφ) ^(k) g(θ−m(i)/M)sinc(W{tilde over (τ)} _(k)−l(i)),  (25)and {tilde over (γ)}_(i)i={tilde over (γ)}_(l,i). The matched filteroutputs, {z_(i)=z_(m(i),l(i)):i=1, . . . K}, corresponding to the Kangle-delay resolution bins occupied by sensor nodes, represent thesufficient statistics for data retrieval at the data retrieval device24.

Retrieval of independent data streams from sensor nodes is the mostchallenging data retrieval task from a communication viewpoint due tointerference between sensor transmissions. This is particularly truewhen a large number of sensor nodes are used. Methods for mitigatinginter-sensor interference are important for energy-efficient operation.The low-power communication channel from the plurality of sensor nodes22 to the data retrieval device 24 is a multiple access channel and thedifferent sensors are analogous to multiple users in a communicationcontext simultaneously accessing the channel. Thus, a range ofmulti-user detection techniques including, but not limited to, codedivision multiple access, frequency division multiple access, timedivision multiple access, global system for mobile communications,general packet radio services, carrier sense multiple access (CSMA),CSMA-collision detection (CSMA-CD), orthogonal frequency divisionmultiplexing, Aloha, slotted Aloha, spectrum portable managementapplication, Bluetooth, IEEE 802.11, etc. as known to those skilled inthe art both now and in the future can be leveraged in this context.

An interference suppression technique can be implemented based on theidea of linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) filtering thatexploits the correlation between the interference corrupting the matchedfilter (MF) output of a desired angle-delay resolution bin and the MFoutputs of the remaining active resolution bins to suppress theinterference in the desired MF output. To achieve this, K LCMV filtersare designed for the active angle-delay resolution bins that jointlyoperate on all active MF outputs. The filters operate on the MF outputswithin each transmission interval. No joint processing is performedacross multiple transmissions in time. Assuming z=[z₁ . . . z_(K)]^(T)denotes the vector of MF outputs corresponding to the active angle-delaybins equation (24) takes the formz=Γβ+w  (26)where Γ=[Γ_(i,j)]=[{tilde over (γ)}_(j,i)] is the coupling matrixbetween the k sensors nodes, β=[β₁ . . . β_(K)]^(T) is the vector ofsensor data, and w is a complex AWGN vector with variance σ². Thefiltered sufficient statistic {tilde over (z)}_(i) for the i^(th) sensornode is obtained as {tilde over (z)}_(i)=h^(H) _(i,opt)z, and the filterh_(i,opt) is designed to minimize the output power (variance) of {tildeover (z)}_(i) subject to a linear constraint that preserves the desiredsignal from the i^(th) sensor node:h _(i,opt) =arg minE(|h ^(H) z| ²)s.t.h ^(H)Γ_(i)=1,  (27)where Γ_(i) is the i^(th) column of Γ. An optimum filter is given by$\begin{matrix}{{h_{i,{opt}} = \frac{R^{- 1}\Gamma_{i}}{R_{i}^{H}R^{- 1}\Gamma_{i}}},} & (28)\end{matrix}$where R=E[zz^(H)] is the correlation matrix of the active MF outputs. Inessence, the constrained optimization results in reduction ofinterference power in the MF output {tilde over (z)}_(i), whilepreserving the desired signal from the i^(th) sensor node.

The computation of LCMV filters can be done in a variety of ways. Thedata correlation matrix R can be directly estimated by using MF outputsfor multiple transmission periods. The estimation of the couplingmatrix, Γ, which defines the constraints, is more challenging. Oneapproach is to make different sensors transmit in disjoint transmissionintervals from which different columns of Γ can be estimated.Alternatively, finer angle-delay position estimates for the differentsensor nodes can be obtained by oversampling the matched filteredoutputs in angle and delay. An approximation to the coupling matrix canbe obtained via the analytical expressions for {tilde over (γ)}_(k,i).

With reference to FIG. 4, an exemplary data retrieval device 24 isshown. Data retrieval device 24 may include linear array 32, atransmit/receive (T/R) signal processor 100, a memory 102, a processor104, and an environment monitoring application 106. The output of lineararray 32 may be spread-spectrum signals, short broadband pulses or asignal synthesized from multiple discrete frequencies, from a frequencyswept (chirp) pulse, etc. T/R signal processor 100 forms the transmittedsignals s(t) transmitted from each antenna of the plurality of antennaelements 28. T/R signal processor 100 also performs some or all of theoperations described with reference to FIG. 2 to determine β=[β₁, . . ., β_(K)]^(T), the vector of encoded, sensed data from each sensor nodeof the plurality of sensor nodes 22. Different and additional componentsmay be utilized by data retrieval device 24. For example, data retrievaldevice 24 includes one or more power source that may be a battery. Dataretrieval device 24 may also include, for example, a display to displayinformation related to the environment sensed by the plurality of sensornodes 22. In an additional embodiment, data retrieval device 24 mayinclude a remote connection to linear array 32.

T/R signal processor 100 includes a signal generator supplied with clockpulses from a clock. The output of the signal generator is provided to apower amplifier, the output of which is provided to a directionalcoupler. The output of the directional coupler is provided to aswitching system, which selectively directs the power leading to eachantenna of the plurality of antenna elements. Dedicated power amplifiersfor the plurality of antenna elements 28 may also be used.

Memory 102 stores environment monitoring application 106, in addition toother information. Data retrieval device 24 may have one or morememories 102 that uses the same or a different memory technology. Memorytechnologies include, but are not limited to, random access memory, readonly memory, flash memory, etc. In an alternative embodiment, memory 102may be implemented at a different device.

Processor 104 executes instructions that may be written using one ormore programming language, scripting language, assembly language, etc.The instructions may be carried out by a special purpose computer, logiccircuits, or hardware circuits. Thus, processor 104 may be implementedin hardware, firmware, software, or any combination of these methods.The term “execution” is the process of running an application or thecarrying out of the operation called for by an instruction. Processor 44executes environment monitoring application 106 and/or otherinstructions. Data retrieval device 24 may have one or more processors104 that use the same or a different processing technology. In analternative embodiment, processor 104 may be implemented at a differentdevice.

Environment monitoring application 106 is an organized set ofinstructions that, when executed, cause data retrieval device 24 toanalyze, display, and/or otherwise process the vector of sensed data.Environment application specifications may also be used by dataretrieval device 24 to send additional control signals to the pluralityof sensor nodes 22 to define the method of encoding the data sensed atthe plurality of sensor nodes. Environment monitoring application 106may be written using one or more programming language, assemblylanguage, scripting language, etc. In an alternative embodiment,environment monitoring application 106 may be executed and/or stored ata different device.

With reference to FIG. 5, an exemplary sensor node 30 is shown. Sensornode 30 may include a transceiver 110, a transmit/receive (T/R) signalprocessor 112, and a sensor 114. In an exemplary embodiment, sensor 114provides a characterization of the local environment at sensor node 30.Environmental monitoring may be in any modality made possible byexisting or future sensing technology, including RF spectralcharacterization data, chemical concentration, temperature, sound,weather, and/or atmospheric data, etc. T/R signal processor 112 performssome or all of the operations described with reference to FIG. 3. T/Rsignal processor 112 processes x_(i)(t) and forms the signal y_(i)(t)transmitted from each sensor node of the plurality of sensor nodes 22.Transceiver 110 transmits y_(i)(t) and receives x_(i)(t). Different andadditional components may be utilized by sensor node 30. For example,sensor node 30 includes one or more power source that may be a battery.

Data retrieval system 20 provides for the flexible retrieval of datafrom a plurality of sensor nodes 22 with reduced cost, latency, andenergy usage. For illustration of possible usage environments of dataretrieval system 20, two data retrieval tasks are analyzed. First, ahigh-rate data retrieval corresponding to distributed, independentsensor measurements is analyzed, and second, a low-rate data retrievalcorresponding to localized, correlated measurements is analyzed. Bothcoherent signal processing and non-coherent signal processing methods atthe receiver are considered. In all cases, a binary transmission fromthe sensor nodes is assumed for the sake of simplicity. The bit-errorprobability, P_(e), is determined as a function of the transmit power ateach sensor node. In each configuration, the exact position of thesensor nodes is fixed, but unknown. Thus, the {tilde over (γ)}_(i) and{tilde over (γ)}_(k,i) are fixed but unknown.

For the case of distributed, independent sensor measurements andcoherent signal processing, the sensor nodes employ binary phase shiftkeying (BPSK) modulation, {β_(i)∈{−1, +1}}, and the phases {φ_(i)} areknown (or estimated) at the receiver. For estimation, the phases {φi}are assumed to be stable for at least two transmission intervals. Eachtransmission from a sensor node consists of two packets: a trainingpacket for phase estimation at data retrieval device 24 followed by adata packet. Assuming a perfect phase estimate at data retrieval device24, the phase corrected matched filter output for the i^(th) sensor nodeis given by $\begin{matrix}{{\overset{\sim}{z}}_{i} = {{\mathbb{e}}^{j\quad\phi_{i}}z_{i}}} & (29) \\{\quad{{= {{\sqrt{M\quad ɛ}\beta_{i}{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}}} + {\sqrt{M\quad ɛ}{\sum\limits_{k \neq i}{\beta_{k}\gamma\quad k}}}}},{{i\quad{\mathbb{e}}^{j\quad\phi_{i}}} + w_{i}}}} & (30) \\{\quad{{= {S_{i} + I_{i} + w_{i}}},}} & (31)\end{matrix}$where S_(i) and I_(i) represent the signal and interference terms,respectively. Using a Gaussian approximation for the interference I_(i),the optimal estimate for the i^(th) sensor transmission is {circumflexover (β)}_(i) =sign{re({tilde over (z)}_(i))}. The probability of error,P_(e), is characterized by the Signal-to-Interference-and-Noise-Ratio(SINR) as $\begin{matrix}{{P_{e} = {{Q\left( \sqrt{SINR} \right)} = {Q\left( \sqrt{\frac{2\quad M\quad{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}}^{2}ɛ}{\sigma^{2} + {M{\sum\limits_{k \neq i}{{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{k,i}}^{2}ɛ}}}}} \right)}}},} & (32)\end{matrix}$where the signal power E[|S_(i)|²]=M|{tilde over (γ)}_(i)|²ε, theinterference power E[|I_(i)|²]=MΣ_(k≠i)|{tilde over (γ)}_(k,i)|²ε, andσ² denotes the variance of AWGN w_(i). Without the use of interferencesuppression techniques, the system is interference limited. As a result,P_(e) exhibits an error floor at high SINR $\begin{matrix}{P_{e}->{{Q\left( \sqrt{\frac{2\quad{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}}^{2}}{\sum\limits_{k \neq i}{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{k,i}}^{2}}} \right)}.}} & (33)\end{matrix}$Equation (33) is a function only of the number of sensor nodes and thesensor node positions. In the ideal case, if the sensor node positionsare exactly aligned with the center of the angle-delay resolution bins,then {tilde over (γ)}_(k,i=δ) _(k−i). In this case, there is nointerference between sensors and P_(e) is given by $\begin{matrix}{P_{e} = {Q{\sqrt{\frac{2\quad M\quad ɛ}{\sigma^{2}}}.}}} & (34)\end{matrix}$

For sensor nodes employing non-coherent signaling, β_(i)∈{0, √{squareroot over (2)}}, and the φ_(i) are assumed unknown at data retrievaldevice 24. In this case, the matched filter output in equation (24)takes the formH ₀ :z _(i) =I _(i) +W _(i)  (35)H ₁ :z _(i) =S _(i)+I_(i) +w _(i),  (36)where S_(i) =√{square root over (2Mε)}β _(i){tilde over (γ)}_(i) andI_(i) =√{square root over (2Mε)}93 _(k≠i)β_(k){tilde over (γ)}_(k,i),represent the signal and interference components, respectively.Approximating the interference as Gaussian and using standardtechniques, the optimal decision takes the form $\begin{matrix}{\left. {\frac{p\left( z_{i} \middle| H_{1} \right)}{p\left( z_{i} \middle| H_{0} \right)}\begin{matrix} > \\ < \end{matrix}1}\Rightarrow{{I_{0}\left( \frac{2\quad\alpha{z_{i}}}{{\overset{\sim}{\sigma}}^{2}} \right)}\begin{matrix} > \\ < \end{matrix}{\mathbb{e}}^{\alpha^{2}/{\overset{\sim}{\sigma}}^{2}}} \right.,} & (37)\end{matrix}$where α=√{square root over (2Mε)}|{tilde over (γ)}_(i)|, {tilde over(σ)}²=2MΣ^(k≠i)|{tilde over (γ)}_(k,i)|²ε+σ², and I₀ is the modifiedBessel function of type 1 and order 0. Due to monotonicity of I₀, theoptimum detection rule simplifies to |z_(i)|

λ. The optimal threshold λis a function of {tilde over (γ)}_(i)i and{tilde over (σ)}², and can be optimized for a particular sensor nodeset-up. P_(e) can be characterized by noting that |z_(i)| is Rayleighunder H₀ and Rician H₁ as $\begin{matrix}{P_{e} = {\frac{1}{2}\left\lbrack {P_{e,0} + P_{e,1}} \right\rbrack}} & (38) \\{P_{e,0} = {{P\left( {{z_{i}} > \lambda} \middle| H_{0} \right)} = {\mathbb{e}}^{{- \lambda^{2}}/{\overset{\sim}{\sigma}}^{2}}}} & (39) \\{{P_{e,1} = {{P\left( {{z_{i}} < \lambda} \middle| H_{1} \right)} = {F_{x_{2}^{\,^{\prime}2}{(\frac{2\quad\alpha^{2}}{\sigma^{2}})}}\left( \frac{2\quad\lambda^{2}}{{\overset{\sim}{\sigma}}^{2}} \right)}}},} & (40)\end{matrix}$where F_(x′) _(2(x)) ₂ (y) is the distribution function of anon-central, chi-squared random variable with non-centrality parameter xand 2 degrees of freedom.

In the ideal case, since {tilde over (γ)}_(ki)=δ_(k−i), α²=2Mε, and{tilde over (σ)}²=σ², P_(e) becomes $\begin{matrix}{{P_{e} = {{\frac{1}{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \lambda^{2}}/\sigma^{2}}} + {\frac{1}{2}{F_{x_{2}^{\,^{\prime}2}{(\frac{{AM}\quad ɛ}{\sigma^{2}})}}\left( \frac{2\quad\lambda^{2}}{\sigma^{2}} \right)}}}},} & (41)\end{matrix}$which is the P_(e) for on-off signaling with unknown random phase. Thefactor M in the non-centrality parameter reflects the array gain.

With reference to FIG. 6, the P_(e) for independent sensor measurementsis shown for both coherent and non-coherent signaling. For coherentsignaling, a comparison between ideal coherent processing, non-idealcoherent processing assuming exact phase information, and non-idealcoherent processing assuming phase estimation at 0 dB signal-to-noiseratio (SNR) is shown. For non-coherent signaling, a comparison betweenideal non-coherent processing and non-ideal non-coherent processing isshown. The ideal non-coherent and coherent curves represent benchmarksin which the sensor nodes are located at the center of the angle-delayresolution bins to minimize interference. All other P_(e) plotscorrespond to a random, but fixed position of the plurality of sensornodes within their respective angle-deiay resolution bin. The P_(e)curves reflect the average performance across all sensor nodes.

A single spread-spectrum waveform was used for all virtual spatialbeams: s_(v)(m; t)=q(t) for all m, where a length N=TW=127 pseudo-randombinary code is used for q(t). For coherent reception, the phases{φ_(i)}were assumed to remain constant over two transmission intervals.Each sensor node transmits two bits for each information bit: a trainingbit from which data retrieval device 24 estimates its relative phasefollowed by the information bit. M=L=11 corresponding to a total ofML=121 angle-delay resolution bins were used. The independent sensortransmissions were from K=11 distinct angle-delay resolution bins. Thetransmission bits are iid across all sensor nodes as well as acrosstime. Thus, a total of 11 bits were retrieved in each transmissioninterval. Non-ideal, non-coherent detection incurs a loss in SNR andalso exhibits a P_(e) floor of ≈2×10⁻⁵ at approximately 15 dB due tointerference. Coherent detection performs quite well even in thepresence of interference and assuming a training SNR as low as 0 dB.

With reference to FIG. 7, the experimental P_(e) curves for a set-upsimilar to that in FIG. 6 are compared with the analytic expressionsobtained in equations (32) and (38)-(40). The agreement is excellent forthe ideal coherent and non-coherent curves. The agreement is quite goodeven for the non-ideal coherent and non-coherent curves. The deviationscan be attributed to the Gaussian approximation for interference.

With reference to FIG. 8, the P_(e) for high-rate information retrievalis shown for both coherent and non-coherent signaling with interferencesuppression when all available angle-delay resolution bins (ML=121) areactive, and the sensor nodes send independent bit streams. 121 bits wereretrieved in each transmission interval. The P_(e) for a sensor nodenear the center of the region 26 (maximum interference) was examined. Asindicated in FIG. 8, data retrieval system 20 with interferencesuppression provides excellent performance and exhibits no error floorsin contrast to those encountered using MF-based detection and nointerference suppression.

For the case of a single localized event sensed by sensor nodes inmultiple adjacent angle-delay resolution bins, the sensor measurementsare assumed to be highly correlated (i.e., redundant sensing). As aresult, an identical bit stream was assumed to be transmitted from eachsensor node, i.e., β_(i)=β for all i. The common transmitted bit wasassumed to be independent in different transmission intervals.

An optimal decision in this case is based on the sum of phase-correctedMFoutputs, {circumflex over (β)}_(i)=sign{Re(Σ{tilde over (z)}_(i))}where $\begin{matrix}{{\overset{\sim}{z}}_{i} = {{z_{i}{\mathbb{e}}^{{j\phi}_{i}}} = {{\sqrt{M\quad{ɛ\beta}}\left( {{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}} + {\sum\limits_{k \neq i}{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{k,i}^{{\mathbb{e}}^{{j\phi}_{i}}}}} \right)} + {{\overset{\sim}{w}}_{i}.}}}} & (42)\end{matrix}$The corresponding error probability is approximately given by$\begin{matrix}{P_{e} = {{Q\left( \sqrt{\frac{2M\quad{ɛ\left( {\sum\limits_{i}\left| {{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{i}{^{2}{{+ \left( {1/2} \right)}{\sum\limits_{i}\sum\limits_{k \neq i}}}}{{\overset{\sim}{\gamma}}_{k,i}}^{2}} \right.} \right.}}{\alpha^{2}}} \right)}.}} & (43)\end{matrix}$Thus, a K fold increase in SNR as compared to the case of independenttransmissions is achieved because, instead of interfering, differentsensor nodes contribute to each bit. In the ideal case, the K sensornode transmissions are essentially K parallel AWGN channels transmittingthe same data and $\begin{matrix}{{P_{e} = {Q\left( \frac{\sqrt{2{MK}\quad ɛ}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}},} & (44)\end{matrix}$which is the P_(e) for a BPSK signaling system transmitting with K timesthe individual sensor power.

For non-coherent processing, the MF outputs for the K sensor nodes canbe simplified to z_(i)=α_(i)+w_(i) where α_(i) =√{square root over(2Mε)}({tilde over (γ)} _(i)+Σ_(k≠i){tilde over (γ)}_(k,i)) representsthe effective signal strength. Solving the joint detection problem forβ, the optimal decision is $\begin{matrix}{\hat{\beta} = {{sign}\left( {{\sum\limits_{i}{z_{i}}^{2}} - \lambda^{2}} \right)}} & (45)\end{matrix}$where λ² is the optimal threshold that can be optimized for a givensensor node. configuration. |z_(i)∥H₀ is approximately Rayleigh(σ²/2),therefore, (2/σ²)|z_(i)|²|H₀ is approximately χ₂ ², the standard centralchi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom. Thus,$\begin{matrix}{{P_{e,0} = {{P\left( {{\sum\limits_{i}{z_{i}}^{2}} < \lambda^{2}} \middle| H_{o} \right)} = {1 - {\underset{x_{2K}}{F_{2}}\left( \frac{2\lambda^{2}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}}}},} & (46)\end{matrix}$where F_(x) _(2K) ₂ (x) is the distribution function of a centralchi-squared random variable with 2K degrees of freedom. Under H₁,|z_(i)∥H₁˜Rice(α_(i)|², σ²/2) which results in

Σ_(i)|z_(i)|²|H₁˜χ′² _(2k)(2α²/σ² where α²=Σ_(i)|α_(i)|². Thus,P_(e,1)=P(Σ_(i)|z_(i|) ²<λ²|H₁ can be defined in terms of the cdf of thechi-squared distribution. The resulting P_(e) is $\begin{matrix}{P_{e,0} = {{\frac{1}{2}\left\lbrack {1 - {F_{\underset{x_{2k}^{\prime}}{2}}\left( \frac{2\lambda^{2}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}} \right\rbrack} + {\frac{1}{2}{{{F_{2}}_{x_{2k}^{\prime}{(\frac{2a^{2}}{\alpha^{2}})}}\left( \frac{2\lambda^{2}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}.}}}} & (47)\end{matrix}$Compared to the independent transmissions case, the absence ofinterference in the K parallel transmissions yields significantperformance improvements. In the ideal situation, we have α2=2KMε.Therefore, $\begin{matrix}{P_{e,0} = {{\frac{1}{2}\left\lbrack {1 - {F_{\underset{x_{2k}^{\prime}}{2}}\left( \frac{2\lambda^{2}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}} \right\rbrack} + {\frac{1}{2}{{{F_{2}}_{x_{2k}^{\prime}{(\frac{4K\quad M_{ɛ}}{\alpha^{2}})}}\left( \frac{2\lambda^{2}}{\alpha^{2}} \right)}.}}}} & (48)\end{matrix}$

With reference to FIG. 9, the P_(e) for correlated sensor measurementsis shown for both coherent and non-coherent signaling. For coherentsignaling, a comparison between ideal coherent processing, non-idealcoherent processing assuming exact phase information, and non-idealcoherent processing assuming phase estimation at 0 dB SNR is shown. Fornon-coherent signaling, a comparison between ideal non-coherentprocessing and non-ideal non-coherent processing is shown. The idealnon-coherent and coherent curves represent benchmarks in which thesensor nodes are located at the center of the angle-delay resolutionbins to minimize interference. All other P_(e) plots correspond to arandom, but fixed position of the plurality of sensor nodes within theirrespective angle-delay resolution bin. The P_(e) curves reflect theaverage performance across all sensor nodes. The sensing configurationcorresponding to correlated (redundant) sensing of a localized eventrepresents identical transmissions from K=12 adjacent bins. Thus, asingle bit of information was retrieved in each transmission period. Asexpected, this case exhibits a dramatic improvement in P_(e) as comparedto independent transmissions due to a lack of interference. In fact, aSNR gain proportional to K due to identical transmissions is realized.Non-ideal detectors (both coherent and non-coherent) perform nearly aswell as ideal detection (no error floors) and coherent detection showsapproximately a 7 dB gain over non-coherent detection.

Data retrieval system 20 exploits MTW signal space dimensions in time,frequency, and space for rapid and energy-efficient informationretrieval from a plurality of sensor nodes 22. In effect, a maximum ofML (L<<TW) channels can be established for data retrieval by resolvingsensor nodes in angle and delay using angle-delay matched filtering,which also provides a sensor localization map at a resolutioncommensurate with M and W.

The numerical results illustrate an inherent rate-reliability tradeoff.The rate of data retrieval can be increased by sensing independentdistributed events through N_(c)<ML sensing channels, although at thecost of reliability due to interference between sensor transmissions. Onthe other hand, reliability can be dramatically increased by using allN_(c) channels for redundant localized sensing at the cost of rate. Theuse of a low-complexity LCMV technique at the data retrieval device 24can significantly enhances the capacity and reliability of informationretrieval.

The foregoing description of exemplary embodiments of the invention havebeen presented for purposes of illustration and of description. It isnot intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the preciseform disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in lightof the above teachings or may be acquired-from practice of theinvention. For example, it is not necessary to resolve a single sensornode in each angle-delay resolution bin. In fact, multiple correlatedsensor transmissions from within each resolution bin can be exploitedfor dramatic reduction in power consumption using phase-coherenttransmissions. Additionally, the sensor node power consumption can befurther reduced by using independently coded transmissions fromdifferent sensors. The embodiments were chosen and described in order toexplain the principles of the invention and as practical applications ofthe invention to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the inventionin various embodiments and with various modifications as suited to theparticular use contemplated. For example, other forms of space-timesignals may be employed by the data retrieval device 24 forinterrogating and retrieving information from the plurality of sensornodes 22. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined bythe claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

1. A data retrieval device, the data retrieval device comprising: aplurality of antennas configured to transmit a first signal toward aplurality of wireless sensor nodes and to receive a second signal fromthe plurality of wireless sensor nodes, the second signal including asensed datum, the sensed datum identified at the plurality of wirelesssensor nodes; and a processor coupled to receive the second signal fromthe plurality of antennas, the processor defining a virtual receivesignal from the received second signal for the plurality of antennas andprocessing the defined virtual receive signal to determine the senseddatum.
 2. The data retrieval device of claim 1, further comprising anapplication, the application configured to process the determined datum.3. A method of retrieving data from a plurality of wireless sensornodes, the method comprising: transmitting a first signal from aplurality of antennas toward a plurality of wireless sensor nodes;receiving a second signal from the plurality of wireless sensor nodes atthe plurality of antennas, the second signal including a sensed datum,the sensed datum identified at the plurality of wireless sensor nodes;defining a virtual receive signal from the received second signal forthe plurality of antennas; and processing the defined virtual receivesignal to determine the sensed datum.
 4. The method of claim 3, whereinthe first signal is a. wideband, space-time signal.
 5. The method ofclaim 3, wherein the second signal is a superposition of signalstransmitted from the plurality of wireless sensor nodes.
 6. The methodof claim 3, wherein the plurality of antennas form a linear array. 7.The method of claim 3, wherein the sensed datum is independent for atleast two of the plurality of wireless sensor nodes.
 8. The method ofclaim 3, wherein the sensed datum is correlated for at least two of theplurality of wireless sensor nodes.
 9. The method of claim 3, whereindefining the virtual receive signal comprises defining a discreteFourier transform matrix whose columns form an orthonormal basis for aspatial signal space.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the discreteFourier transform matrix columns are normalized steering vectors forvirtual angles corresponding to beamforming in a plurality of virtualdirections.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein defining the virtualreceive signal further comprises defining a virtual spatial matrix fromthe discrete Fourier transform matrix.
 12. The method of claim 11,wherein the virtual spatial matrix partitions the plurality of wirelesssensor nodes based on the virtual angles.
 13. The method of claim 3,wherein processing the virtual receive signal includes partitioning theplurality of wireless sensor nodes based on a time delay.
 14. The methodof claim 13, wherein the time delay has a resolution 1/W, where W is thetwo-sided bandwidth of the transmitted first signal.
 15. The method ofclaim 3, wherein defining the virtual receive signal comprises a spatialtransform matrix whose columns form an orthonormal basis for the spatialsignal space.
 16. The method of claim 3, wherein processing the virtualreceive signal further comprises correlating the filtered virtualreceive signal with a time delayed version of the transmitted firstsignal.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein processing the virtualreceive signal further comprises decoding the correlated virtual receivesignal.
 18. The method of claim 3, wherein the transmitted first signalincludes a spreading code.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein adifferent spreading code is used to transmit the first signal from atleast one of the plurality of antennas.
 20. A data retrieval system, thedata retrieval system comprising: a plurality of wireless sensor nodes,the plurality of wireless sensor nodes including a transceiver receivinga first signal and transmitting a second signal, the second signalincluding a sensed datum identified at the plurality of wireless sensornodes; and a data retrieval device, the data retrieval device includinga plurality of antennas transmitting the first signal toward theplurality of wireless sensor nodes and receiving the second signal fromthe plurality of wireless sensor nodes; and a processor coupled toreceive the received second signal from the plurality of antennas, theprocessor defining a virtual receive signal from the received secondsignal for the plurality of antennas and processing the defined virtualreceive signal to determine the identified sensed datum.
 21. The systemof claim 20, wherein a wireless sensor node of the plurality of wirelesssensor nodes includes a sensor, the sensor determining the sensed datum.22. The system of claim 21, wherein the wireless sensor node encodes thedetermined datum.
 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the wirelesssensor node modulates the encoded datum onto a spreading code formingthe second signal.
 24. The system of claim 20, wherein a wireless sensornode of the plurality of wireless sensor nodes transmits the secondsignal after a time delay.
 25. The system of claim 20, wherein awireless sensor node of the plurality of wireless sensor nodes transmitsthe second signal instantaneously.
 26. The system of claim 20, whereinthe receive first signal is a superposition of signals transmitted fromthe plurality of antennas of the data retrieval device.